Home About Live Demo Pricing Resources Privacy Contact
State rules hub

Attorney Advertising Rules by State for Automated Intake

State rules are not interchangeable. This hub identifies the four jurisdictions currently reviewed in depth on this site and gives firms a repeatable checklist for every other state without pretending the review is complete.

By Arsenii Olshevsky, founder of Versa Group Published 8 min read

Last reviewed 31 July 2026  ·  Four-state guide hub; additional jurisdictions are not yet represented as reviewed.

Which state attorney advertising rules are covered here?

Versa currently publishes reviewed guides for California, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. Those guides link to primary rules and explain the operational distinction between a response to an inbound request and outreach initiated by a firm. No other state is represented here as fully reviewed.

JurisdictionStart withOperational questionDetailed guide
CaliforniaRules 7.1 and 7.3Is the message a requested reply or a solicitation?California guide
TexasRules 7.01 to 7.06Is the communication covered advertising, solicitation, or an inbound response?Texas guide
FloridaRules 4-7.11 to 4-7.23Do solicitation, filing, content, or record rules apply?Florida section
ArizonaER 7.1 to ER 7.3Is the script truthful, properly supervised, and within solicitation limits?Arizona section

Why can’t one intake script be approved nationally?

States share broad themes, but definitions, filing requirements, disclaimers, retention duties, and solicitation restrictions differ. A nationally consistent product can still use state-specific script versions and routing rules while preserving one technical architecture.

The safe pattern is a base script plus a jurisdiction overlay approved by the subscribing firm. Store which version produced each message so the firm can reconstruct the communication later.

What is the first legal classification to make?

Determine whether the person asked the firm for information or the firm initiated contact for business. A reply to a submitted intake form or missed call is factually different from a cold marketing text, but each state’s rules and the exact script still control.

Do not mix requested intake with promotional follow-up. Separate triggers, consent records, templates, suppression, and reporting make the classification easier to defend.

What should every state review include?

Review every rule category that can change the workflow. Include communications, advertising, direct contact, solicitation, firm names, labels, filing or review, retention, supervision, confidentiality, and unauthorized practice. Then check relevant ethics opinions and state-specific implementation guidance.

Map each rule to a control: approved wording, channel restriction, jurisdiction flag, record, human handoff, or disabled feature. A memo that does not change the workflow is not enough.

How should multi-state firms configure intake?

Resolve the responsible firm and jurisdiction before selecting the script. Keep tenant data isolated, apply the firm’s timezone and business hours, and make state-specific feature flags explicit. If jurisdiction is unclear, use a conservative neutral script and route to a person.

The system should never guess which lawyer is authorized, whether a deadline applies, or whether the firm will accept the matter.

How should an unlisted state be handled?

Do not copy the nearest state’s guide. Go to the official state bar or court rules, identify the current professional-conduct and advertising provisions, and have counsel approve the exact intake and marketing sequences before activation.

This hub will add jurisdictions only when a primary-source review is complete. That is more useful than a 50-state table that hides uncertainty behind one-line summaries.

Which states are covered by Versa's advertising-rule guides?

California, Texas, Florida, and Arizona are currently covered with detailed guides and primary-source links. Other states are not represented on this site as fully reviewed.

Are attorney advertising rules the same in every state?

No. States differ on solicitation, filing or review, labels, content, retention, and supervision. Use a base intake workflow with a jurisdiction-specific script and control layer.

Is replying to an inbound lead the same as cold solicitation?

No. They are factually different, but the legal classification still depends on the jurisdiction, trigger, channel, and exact content. Keep requested intake and promotional outreach in separate workflows.

Can a multi-state firm use one intake platform?

Yes, with jurisdiction-specific controls. The platform should resolve the correct firm and jurisdiction, isolate tenant data, apply the approved script, record its version, and route uncertainty to a person.

What should a firm review besides advertising rules?

Review more than advertising. Include confidentiality, supervision, unauthorized-practice boundaries, consent and opt-outs, data retention, accessibility, and state ethics opinions relevant to automated communications.

What should a firm do if its state is not listed?

Start with the official state bar or court rules and have qualified counsel approve the exact intake and marketing workflows. Do not assume another state's summary applies.

Turn the rule review into controls

Approve the exact script, jurisdiction logic, record, handoff, and kill switch before a real prospective client enters the workflow.

Open the live demoSee pricing
Scope. This is a navigation and implementation guide, not a 50-state legal survey. Versa Group is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Rules change; use official sources and qualified counsel for the subscribing firm.